Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts

Sunday, February 8, 2015

The Evolving Universe and Why Its Physical Laws Are Transient

Ask yourself these two questions:

It is well known now that the universe is expanding. As the universe changes size, will its expansion cause physical laws to evolve, such that a universe’s physical laws (non-Torah laws) are impermanent and in need continual reevaluation? This may not seem obvious at first, but when asking: Do scientists claim that the laws of our universe existed prior to its creation? It becomes apparent that the physical laws, meaning non-Torah laws, which govern our universe are not absolute and that they had to have evolved as the universe chronologically expands from nothing. This must be the explanation for the mathematical discrepancies between the physics of the large and quantum reality (physics of the small.) IMHO, as we enter the age of Moshiach the physical laws the govern the universe will continue toward perfection and ease of use.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Questions about Creation Physicists Probably Would Like to Wish Away

1. What was the universe like before it had matter? Was matter created or destroyed in during the universe’s construction?

2. As the universe changes size, will its expansion cause physical laws to evolve, such that a universe’s physical laws are impermanent and in need continual reevaluation?

3. Do scientists claim that the laws of our universe existed prior to its creation?

4. As temperature approaches absolute zero, is there a decrease in quantum indeterminacy that makes Planck length variable?

5. In theory, is the absurdity of other universes limitless?

6. Should the expansion of the universe, especially as we calculate events closer and closer to the beginning of time, be any reason for lack of confidence when calculating the physics of the past?

7. If time is as relative as cosmologists claim, as in the case of the virtually incomparable nature of time elapse inside a black hole versus time on earth, then how can scientists claim confidence in the duration of our universe’s epochs?

Note: This blog post “Questions about Creation Physicists Probably Would Like to wish Away” is actually composed 2 earlier blog posts, Questions about the Universe I Hope to Be Able to Answer Someday, and Pt. 2 of Questions I Hope to Be Able to Answer about the Universe combined and edited.

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Pt. 2 of Questions I Hope to Be Able to Answer about the Universe

1.  Do scientists believe that the laws of our universe existed prior to its creation?

2.  Can any or all the physical laws of a universe evolve?

3.  Should we identify other universes through factors of their absurdity and/or their impossibility for analysis?

4.  Is it too absurd to claim that other universes within the multiverse are shrinking?

5.  Is the absurdity of other universes limitless?

6.  Should the expansion of the universe, especially as we calculate events closer and closer to the beginning of time, be any reason for lack of confidence when calculating the physics of the past?

7.  If time is as relative as cosmologists claim, as in the case of the virtually incomparable nature of time elapse inside a black hole versus time on earth, then how can scientists claim confidence in the duration of our universe’s epochs?

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Joining The Minority Among Science Researchers: Thinking Outside The Box

It is too early for science to be so bold in its claims with respect to carbon and radioactive dating, which the Rebbe explains in his letter, “The Age of The Universe.” As I once wrote, we don’t have a working Theory of Everything in science. We don’t know how oxidative stresses such as corrosion may interact with many of the current various means for dating the universe. When I read the about the Exodus, I think that it is a sign of maturity to not just discard the story in favor of science. Remember Proverbs, “Fools rush in.” It is better to try to be creative, and to ponder ways science and the Bible might both be true. Perhaps, due to corrosion the Exodus was recorded in the fossil record, in a way that has baffled scientists. Outside of radioactive and carbon dating, the fossil record show two mass exoduses from Africa, but as you know the dates don’t match given our present understanding of science. Yet, it is too far of a leap to say that the dates do not match at all.