Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Collected Facebook Comments on the Occupy Wall Street Movement 10/4 – 10/5, 2011

Some of My Collected Comments on the Occupy Wall Street Movement 10/4 – 10/5, 2011
sometimes the haves are not the people that deserve and sometimes the have nots are the people that deserve. in this world the key is put into our hands. we can either do something to make things right or choose not to. i applaud all the people that stand up for what is right and I encourage everyone to measure their neighbor by how much they give and not what they get. and to the person that would give but is physically or mentally incapable of giving as much as their neighbor but would if they could, it is just as if they have given just as much as the person who seemingly has everything to give
We will not fail. Our success does not rest on the success of a leader. Everyone in the movement is a part of the team. Leaders are too easily put out of commission, but groups cant fail when any one individual fails.
‎1% of the people have too much!
Isn't this what Occupy Wall Street is saying and yet when I Google Occupy Wall Street, the news sources are telling me that this movement is a joke? The news is lying. Occupy Wall Street is a coherent movement. So what if it doesn't have a leader! Not having a leader makes it stronger. If a movement has a leader then when the leader is stopped or assassinated then it dies. Leaders are to easily put out of commission, but a group of people with the same ideas and they don’t have to be perfectly similar is stronger because it is more difficult to stop. you can stop any one person, several people or even many people but the movement won’t lose momentum.
Craig Hamilton movements with leaders are too easily put down. all you have to is put down the leader or install a fake one. perhaps what put the brakes on the tea party was the installation of a pathetic leader, Sarah Palin, to their cause. this is the power that the 1% have that control the media. they can put terrible leaders into good causes by giving them financial backing. the strength of occupy wall street is that it has no leader.
Craig Hamilton the 99% are the ones that can be replaced by computers. doctors wake up. these people are you too. the current model, capitalism, treats people as supply. people are not supply! guess what the clock is ticking and humans are becoming obsolete. we owe it to ourselves to not treat each other as supply
Craig Hamilton the 1% used their financial power to put Sarah Palin as the leader of the tea party. the 1% sabotaged the tea party by giving it a terrible leader. we are the occupy wall street movement. a leader does not speak for us. we have mouths. we speak for ourselves.
one person is never able to do the work of 475 people, yet you would think so if pay scales were fair. this is my promise to that 1 person of the 475 that has the ability to share the wealth and not be greedy: YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED FOR THERE WILL COME A TIME WHEN A COMPUTER CAN DO YOUR JOB LIKE IT CAN DO THE REST OF OUR JOBS. We are the 99%. WE can be replaced and you the 1% that oppresses us will be replaceable too!
Craig Hamilton There is definitely something self defeating about the idea of this movement getting a leader. This is how it would likely go. The movement accepts someone as their leader. Now she needs to get elected. Now she needs campaign contributions. Now she sells out some thinking that that she will still be able to accomplish something. One thing leads to another and nothing gets accomplished.
Craig Hamilton the 1% would love to sabotage this movement by giving it one of their leaders in the same way they sabotaged the tea party by making Sarah Palin its leader. the 1% control the media. they want to install their leaders. and the list of complaints that the 99% has is massive. this list is too massive to be organized
One reason we can be sure that Occupy Wall Street is important is that people are knocking it. Like the professors that grade a student too harshly for wanting to change the establishment, the press and others have been knocking this group since day one. They say Occupy Wall Street is too this or too that. They don't play by the rules. They are too unorthodox. They are x, so they can't. They are y, so they can't. They are z, so they can't. But, let me tell you all the criticisms Occupy Wall Street is getting are nothing but the earmarks of a group that has great potential, the kind that makes history.
Craig Hamilton What gives with the technical difficulties on Facebook on the subject of occupy wall street? they aren't letting me like or comment many times now.
Craig Hamilton what gives Facebook is not letting me like your comments? corporations are still trying to keep us from succeeding. senator sanders says this movement has millions of followers not thousands.
Craig Hamilton I think that either Facebook or the government is already trying to stop this movement by making it seem less popular than it really is. for example, sometimes my comments have been blocked and Facebook blocks me from using the like button as often as i would like to on this subject.
Craig Hamilton re roger yours is just one of the many comments I have tried to like but have been prevented from doing so. in my opinion this is Facebook trying to quash this movement.
Occupy Wall Street, leader, direction, coherent, Facebook, haves, have nots, Sarah Palin, robots, obsolete, quash, criticism, criticism refuted, 1%, we are the 99%

No comments:

Post a Comment