What is anarchy?

Sunday, April 26, 2009

What is anarchy?

Foremost, anarchy forbids evangelism, and a higher power. Jesus said to his followers, “Go and make disciples.” Anarchists do not do that. Nor do we have any concern if we have a disciple or not, such that forbids a higher power other than man or woman, himself or herself. Speaking of the power of humanity, we ourselves are that higher power through freewill that we use to accomplish dominion over planet earth. However, it is true that we accomplish dominion in our own personal ways. Thus, faith in a Christian God, specifically Jesus, is a complete impossibility for an anarchist.

Even greater the statement, “We are the anarchists united,” as a motto is a false ideal. Such a group of people will only band together for evangelistic purposes of subjection of another people. However, this is not to say that subjection itself would be forbidden, but subjection, such as mastery and slavery can only occur given social mobility, especially that of the slave. Thus, if a slave has the potential to reach the level of mastery, and it is agreed upon that subjection is okay in this circumstance for whatever reason then subjection is okay. As a result, a system of casted slaves, such as Africans, should appear downright detestable to any true anarchist. One might only think of such a thing as a form of retribution for rule and evangelism.

Anarchy does not mandate that, “All are created equal.” Yet, it does mandate that individuals are not alike. With billions of people in the world, coexistence is mandatory, such that we must conclude that we must have a societal role. For instance, an anarchist teacher teaches that obedience is a false ideal, but he or she would say, in anarchy there can be no Sheppard. Everyone does as he or she pleases, and this is the ideal. Most people by the time they are eighty years old realize the importance of acquiring this ideal. Each must have their own societal role and achieve specialization in it, even if that specialization is general knowledge, as there are so many people, meaning any person without individuality is nothing among anarchists that demand one possess personal modus operandi.

Christianity unlike anarchy mandates subjection of its followers to the idea of a higher powers authority about what Jesus is. That is Jesus as a God is what that person perceives Jesus as a God to be. Then, magically Jesus is always able to become that, as it is the idea the person that conceived of a sovereign Jesus to be. This is inescapable. This is why Christians like their idea of Jesus. They, the individuals Christians, conceived of their idea of what their Jesus is. Even more interesting is that they like to argue over whose idea is the best, such that there is a hierarchy through words such as pastor, priest, nun, study leader or deacon and so on, even specialization, such as music minister or youth pastor. Mainly, rule by divine right that individuals’ in the church desire is completely impossible to reconcile with the idea of anarchy. One is unable to pray to a higher power, and be obedient to it and claim any sort of individuality.

There is an end to this in the idea of defining anarchist government. There may be positions, such as President, Prime Minister, Knight, King, businessperson or mercenary, but these people are for the purpose of representation through the idea of mandatory specialization in society, as any law or decision they might make is virtually inapplicable to an anarchist, except that it is annoying. Likewise, an anarchist might choose not to recognize such people as representative, if they start doing these things. These people spoken of to an anarchist are politicians, and politicians are often useful in settling matters with people that might live elsewhere and be disgruntled. An anarchist may or may not support their cause, such that in piety anarchy does not rule out the idea of socialism or communism, as it does not rule out the idea of greed in primitivism.

Anarchists are not for peace or war, or promoting of any sort of action in piety, except what is agreeable to each party. Additionally, someone that is greedy is unlikely to get very far in anarchy, as another anarchist would return anger for this and have no fear of any government stopping him, and here there might be a sense of mob rule, but the idea of a mob is not one of great cohesion or unity. The idea of a mob connotes loose connection generated for a purpose of retribution for misdoings of another group or individual. Then, the words of war and peace become either a state of existence or a transition, where there will probably be some sort of end to it all eventually.